Introducing Andrew Hall, a guest blogger from "An Apple a Day." His fresh-for-Luciole entry is: "Chupacabra: From Myth to Mainstream"




Thank you so much Andrew and Tara! I know Luciole readers will be happy to check out
the An Apple a Day blog as well!

~ Karen




Chupacabra: From Myth to Mainstream

And so another myth is put to bed forever. The chupacabra - whose name literally translates from the Spanish as "goat sucker" and was long thought to be some sort of beast with an unproven (but possible) existence, like the Sasquatch - has been reduced to simply being a breed of wild dog or coyote suffering from extreme, terminal cases of mange.

The essential appeal of the chupacabra as a mythical creature (and its rather substantial menace) comes from reports from farmers in Puerto Rico, Mexico, areas in Latin America and the United States in which people found farm animals and pets dead in large quantities with puncture wounds - like fangs - and having had all of their blood sucked. People blamed these deaths on vampires and on cults, then began blaming them on strange-looking creatures with "dog-like, rodent-like or reptile-like" appearances with "long snouts, large fangs, leathery or scaly greenish-gray skin and a nasty odor." Given their malevolence and particular fondness for animal blood, and the excitement inherent in discovering something, the myth of the chupacabra spread as the killings did. Some people claimed that the chupacabra could hop like a kangaroo, could make people feel nauseous, had a forked tongue, and distinct fangs. By the mid-2000s, supposed chupacabras had even been sighted in Russia.

Then, of course, came the media. There's a made-for-TV Scooby-Doo movie, the films Chupacabra: Dark Seas and Guns of El Chupacabra, episodes of "The X-Files" and "Dexter's Laboratory" and a song by the tremendous Welsh indie rock band Super Furry Animals called "Chupacabras" on their excellent album Radiator. Most of these came within a few years of 1995, when the term chupacabra was coined, things went quiet for a while.

However, the beast turned out to be nothing so magical. After farmers killed animals to protect their livestock in Texas, analysis of the carcasses proved that the supposed chupacabra was a coyote suffering from extremely severe cases of demodectic or sarcoptic mange. Barry OConnor, a biologist at the University of Michigan, theorizes that the majority of the world's reported chupacabra sightings are in fact coyotes, and that the effects of mange produce the chupacabra-like appearance, which produces substantial hair loss in wild dogs (whereas it produces scabies in humans), and that coyotes in particular are susceptible because domestic dogs, like and because of centuries of human contact, can resist the scabies-causing mites in a way that wild dogs cannot.

Because the coyote has no defenses, it takes on the distinct appearance of the chupacabra, and because the mange weakens the animal so dramatically, it loses its ability to hunt, prompting it to prey on livestock and domestic animals over species that would put up more of a fight.

In the strangest of all footnotes, one highly influential supposed chupacabra sighting was in fact based on an eyewitness description that turned out to be most consistent with the alien from the horror movie Species, released in 1995 (when the chupacabra myth gained momentum in pop culture) and which the eyewitness had supposedly recently seen. All in all, a rather reasonable conclusion to what was a fascinating - albeit farfetched - supposed evil creature sighting.
 

Andrew Hall is a guest blogger for An Apple a Day and a writer on the subject of medical transcription training for the Guide to Health Education.





 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments
  • No comments exist for this post.
Leave a comment

Submitted comments are subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.