Dr. Laura, Sarah Palin, and the fight over free speech

Dr. Laura, Sarah Palin, and the fight over free speech
Thu Aug 19, 6:38 pm ET
In the wake of Dr. Laura Schlessinger’s decision to end her radio
show after repeatedly using a racial epithet, she’s spent quite a bit of
time talking about freedom of speech. “I want to regain my First
Amendment rights,” Schlessinger said, contending that special-interest
groups were limiting her freedom to express herself.
Sarah Palin
jumped in and tweeted, “Dr.Laura: don't retreat ... reload! (Steps aside
bc her 1st Amend.rights ceased 2exist thx 2activists trying
2silence"isn't American,not fair")"
That was soon followed by a second tweet:
“Dr.Laura=even
more powerful & effective w/out the shackles,so watch out
Constitutional obstructionists. And b thankful 4 her voice, America!)"
Have Dr. Laura’s rights been trampled? Are her critics undercutting the Constitution?
The answer can be found in the First Amendment itself. Though Palin
speaks frequently of the need to protect the Constitution and elect
politicians who understand it, in this case she is misreading the
amendment and how it works.
Here are five facts about Dr. Laura and the First Amendment:
• The First Amendment protects us from the government, and not from other Americans who disagree with what we have to say.
• Boycotts are also protected by the First Amendment.
Dr. Laura complains about being “bullied” by those who might pressure
her radio affiliates or advertisers, but boycotts are a time-honored use
of the First Amendment to address perceived wrongs and have played a
role in virtually every social movement in American history.
• Efforts to punish controversial speech comes from the right and the left.
It’s true that liberal organizations are attacking Dr. Laura for use of
the racial epithet, just as conservative organizations burned Dixie
Chicks CDs when Natalie Maines told a London audience that she was
embarrassed that President Bush came from Texas. Politicians and
interest groups of all stripes consistently seek to limit the other
side’s free speech.
• The marketplace of ideas and the marketplace are different things.
We tend to take a romantic view of a nation in which we’re all free to
speak, which thereby enriches “the marketplace of ideas.” In the
marketplace, however, economic rules apply. Controversial comments can
be rewarded with a growing audience or punished by unsettled
advertisers. Speech is free; airtime is not.
• Dr. Laura’s First Amendment rights are alive and well.
Although she’s leaving her radio show, she says she’ll continue to
share her views through public speaking, TV interviews, in print,
online, and in a new book due in January, all made possible by the First
Amendment.
“Congress shall make no law” — the first five words of the First
Amendment — say it all: No government body can limit our rights to speak
out. In this case, there’s no government action, just public outrage
and pressure.
The First Amendment Center is a nonpartisan organization that promotes the study of free-expression issues, including freedom of speech, of the press and of religion, and the rights to assemble and to petition the government. To learn more, go to www.1forall.us
Article: HERE




The market place of ideas is really the fighting ground. Times are changing and the media is being challenged by bloggers and non corporate entities for their versions of the truth. I personally don't give Palin's assessments or advice much credence. She doesn't begin to understand civics 101 or the Constitution of the United States.
Perhaps a new direction is what is best for Dr. Laura. I am sure she will continue to have a loyal following.
Reply to this